شناسایی و اولویتبندی موانع تولید مجدد با رویکرد چابکی در صنایع ایران با استفاده از روش فرایند تحلیل سلسلهمراتبی فازی
چکیده
هدف: هدف این پژوهش شناسایی و اولویتبندی موانع تولید مجدد با رویکرد چابکی در صنایع ایران است.
روششناسی پژوهش: پژوهش از نوع کاربردی–توصیفی است و دادهها از طریق پرسشنامه و نظرات خبرگان حوزه تولید جمعآوری شد. برای رتبهبندی عوامل از روش تحلیل سلسلهمراتبی فازی استفاده گردید.
یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد محدودیتهای مالی، پیچیدگی پروژهها و مقاومت در برابر تغییر، مهمترین موانع تولید مجدد هستند. همچنین عوامل سازمانی و کمبود تخصص در لجستیک معکوس تاثیر بالایی بر کندی این فرآیند دارند.
اصالت/ارزشافزوده علمی: استفاده از رویکرد چابکی همراه با FAHP در تحلیل موانع تولید مجدد، دیدی چندبعدی و دقیق از چالشهای توسعه تولید پایدار ارایه میدهد.
کلمات کلیدی:
تولید، تولید مجدد، چابکی، فرایند تحلیل سلسهمراتبی فازیمراجع
- [1] Gunasekara, H., Gamage, J., & Punchihewa, H. (2018). Remanufacture for sustainability: A review of the barriers and the solutions to promote remanufacturing. 2018 international conference on production and operations management society (POMS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/POMS.2018.8629474
- [2] Ayati, S. M., Shekarian, E., Majava, J., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2022). Toward a circular supply chain: Understanding barriers from the perspective of recovery approaches. Journal of cleaner production, 359, 131775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131775
- [3] Paterson, D. A. P., Ijomah, W. L., & Windmill, J. F. C. (2017). End-of-life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing. Journal of cleaner production, 148, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.011
- [4] Ganjali, M., Shirouyehzad, H., & Shahin, A. (2014). Analyzing Indexes of agile reverse logistics using interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of modern processes in manufacturing and production, 3(3), 5–16. https://journals.iau.ir/article_556335_b32aa06c4b7fed2bbb73bbdbd0cdc23b.pdf
- [5] Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
- [6] Farsijani, H., & Qayumi Ghahrudi, S. (2014). Identifying and prioritizing barriers to enterprise agility to achieve world-class manufacturing. Industrial management perspective. 13(4), 97–120. (In Persian). https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1307259
- [7] Ghina, W., De Smet, A., & Weerda, K. (2015). Agility: It rhymes with stability. McKinsey quarterly. https://b2n.ir/dw5986
- [8] Debnath, K. B., & Mourshed, M. (2018). Challenges and gaps for energy planning models in the developing-world context. Nature energy, 3(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0095-2
- [9] Zadeh, H. R. (2018). Economic evaluation of the waste recycling industry. The 8th international conference on sustainable development, urban development and regeneration. Qom, Iran. (In Persian). https://elmnet.ir/doc/20881281-11991
- [10] Mizandar, T., & Hasanzadeh, R. (2020). Identifying and ranking obstacles in the clothing manufacturing industry using the ahp and fuzzy topsis methods. The first international conference on challenges and new solutions in industrial engineering, management and accounting. (In Persian). Sari, Iran, Civilica. https://civilica.com/doc/1045246
- [11] Huang, Y. C., & Yang, M. L. (2014). Reverse logistics innovation, institutional pressures and performance. Management research review, 37(7), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0069
- [12] Mohammadi Moghaddam, Y., Dadfar, A., & Gazmeh, A. (2017). The impact of organizational unlearning on organizational performance with the mediating role of organizational agility. Journal of human resource management research, 9(34), 243-265. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2017.3110
- [13] Ali, A., & Wasim, A. (2022). Innovative framework for assessing the impact of agile manufacturing in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252329335
- [14] Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International journal of production economics, 62(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00219-9
- [15] Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1994). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. Van nostrand reinhold. https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Agile-Competitors-Virtual-Organizations-Strategies/dp/0442019033
- [16] Vaez, N., & Shahbazi Chegni, Z. (2022). Network analysis of obstacles to reverse logistics deployment in cellulose industries in saveh county. The first international research conference in accounting, management, economics and humanities. (In Persian). Koln, Jermani. Civilica. https://civilica.com/doc/1533558
- [17] Ravi, V., & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological forecasting and social change, 72(8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.07.002
- [18] Pourshafie Ardestani, M., & Sarvari, H. (2020). Identifying and investigating usage barriers of agile project management in road construction projects. Amirkabir journal of civil engineering, 52(7), 1837-1852. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2019.15677.5996
- [19] Patel, B. S., & Sambasivan, M. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on supply chain agility. Management research review, 45(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2020-0574
- [20] Abaei, K. (2024). A study on the challenges of the paper recycling industry in Iran. Korea’s scientific and cultural student journal, 7(1), 30-35. (In Persian). https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_99592.html
- [21] Abdulrahman, M. D., Gunasekaran, A., & Subramanian, N. (2014). Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. International journal of production economics, 147, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.003
- [22] Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European journal of operational research, 240, 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012
